Bad news for SpongeBob

Posted by on December 13, 2013 in Featured, Wildlife Watch | 0 comments

This undated image provided by Brown University via the journal Science in December 2013 shows a Mnemiopsis leidyi, a species of comb jelly known as a sea walnut. A new study published online in the journal Science says comb jellies, a group of gelatinous marine animals, represent the oldest branch of the animal family tree. (AP Photo/Brown University, Stefan Siebert)
The Mnemiopsis leidyi, a species of comb jelly known as a sea walnut, is among a group of gelatinous marine animals that represent the oldest branch of the animal family tree. (AP Photo/Brown University, Stefan Siebert)

SpongeBob won’t be happy about this, but sponges are getting squeezed out of a distinctive role in evolution. A new study says the animals that inspired the oddball cartoon character don’t represent the oldest branch of the animal family tree after all.

The DNA research gives the spot instead to comb jellies, a group of gelatinous marine animals with cartoonish names like the sea walnut and the sea gooseberry.

All animals evolved from a single ancestor and scientists want to know more about how that happened. More than half a billion years ago, long before humans appeared, the first split in the tree separated one lineage from all other animals. Traditionally, scientists have thought it was sponges.

The evidence in favor of comb jellies comes from deciphering the first complete genetic code from a member of this group. Scientists were finally able to compare the full DNA codes from all the earliest branches.

The genome of a sea walnut, a plankton-eating creature native to the western Atlantic Ocean, was reported online Thursday in the journal Science by Andreas Baxevanis of the National Human Genome Research Institute with co-authors there and elsewhere. The work supports some earlier indications that comb jellies were the first to branch off.

Sorting out the early branching of the tree could help scientists learn what the ancestor of all animals was like. But despite decades of study and the traditional view favoring sponges, there is plenty of disagreement about which early branch came first.

The question is “devilishly difficult” to answer, and the new paper is probably not the last word, said Antonis Rokas of Vanderbilt University, who did not participate in the new work.

“The results need to be taken seriously,” he said, but “I’m pretty sure there will be other studies that suggest something else.”

———

Online:

Science: http://www.sciencemag.org

———

Reported by MALCON RITTER of the Associated Press. He can be followed at http://www.twitter.com/malcolmritter

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>